Time to talk tough on issues, not expenses

MP Maria Miller MP Maria Miller

THE focus on MPs’ expenses has overshadowed the issues that really matter to the people of Basingstoke, the town’s MP claims.

Last week, Maria Miller told The Gazette that she would stop claiming her second home allowance and would cut other expenditure, and yesterday she tried to shift the focus on to the Government’s handling of the economy and the needs of Basingstoke.

But her decision to stop claiming that allowance has also prompted a large and lively debate on The Gazette website – basingstokegazette.co.uk – with some comments calling for her to go and oth ers backing the MP who has represented Basingstoke since 2005.

Mrs Miller told The Gazette: “The lack of focus nationally on what is the worst recession this country has faced must leave people questioning whether people have got their priorities right.”

The Conservative MP said she had received only 29 letters about expenses in her postbag, which was dominated by concerns about travellers, benefits and the child support agency.

She believes the issues that matter to her constituents are the town’s doubling of unemployment and high house-building targets imposed on the borough.

“We need a general election as soon as possible,” she said. “I think this Government has lost all authority and we need a change of Government so we can get the solutions people want, particularly when it comes to supporting Basingstoke residents – getting the sort of sup port they need to get through the reces sion and return action on house-building and planning to our local representatives.”

Asked whether she thought the expenses scandal engulfing the House of Commons meant her seat could be threatened if there was an early election, Mrs Miller said: “I think people at a General Election are voting for a change and are fed up with a Labour Government that’s let them down for a decade.”

Meanwhile, two other North Hampshire MPs have declined to say whether they will follow the example of Basingstoke’s MP and stop claiming the controversial second home allowance.

North West Hampshire MP Sir George Young said he would wait until the results of a review being conducted into MPs’ expenses before making a decision.

The Committee on Standards in Public Life, led by Sir Christopher Kelly, launched the review in April and it is due to report later this year.

Sir George, whose constituency includes Tadley, Whitchurch, Overton and Andover, told The Gazette: “I would like to wait until Sir Christopher Kelly has reported and make a judgement in the light of his actions.”

The Conservative MP said his allowance claims, which he has published on his website for two years, were among some of the lowest in Parliament.

He said: “My costs for the last year were 542 out of 646 MPs. My costs are already in the bottom quartile of costs.”

North East Hampshire MP James Arbuthnot, whose constituency covers Hook, Odiham and Hartley Wintney, did not respond to The Gazette’s calls as he was canvassing for today’s county and European elections. Mr Arbuthnot’s claims for 2007/08 placed him 333 out of 646 MPs, while Mrs Miller’s was the 222nd highest claimant, according to website theyworkforyou.com.

Mrs Miller, who rents a home in Old Basing and owns a London home that she classifies as her second home, said last week that she would make “big changes” to allow her to meet the cost of her London home from her salary.

She added she would save £10,000 by cutting costs at her constituency office.

Mrs Miller also promised to place all her claims online and to hold an annual review of her constituency costs.

Comments(6)

Willy Winky says...
11:24am Thu 4 Jun 09

Too little too late springs to mind once again.
As Maria senses an election on the horizon she steps up her attacks on the present government and although she may be right in what she says I doubt her party would do any better.

People have good memories Maria so you have to convince the public of this borough that you can do better for us and for the country than this present lot.

I have yet to see any inkling that suggests to me that changing governments will be any use to us.

Mark Lane says...
2:30pm Thu 4 Jun 09

I wonder where the communications budget for this MP actually goes as I've never seen anything from her. I guess the issue here is it would be nice to have a local person representing us - that would cut down a lot of these costs...

R_Johnson says...
9:05am Sat 6 Jun 09

In fairness to me she has helped me out in the past (Well Nicola - her overworked assistant has if I'm honest).

She has to go. What she has done may well have been 'within the rules' but it is morally bankrupt.

It's funny when you consider how many people are put in prison for benefit fraud - yet our MP's are allowed to take as much as they can get no matter if it is morally right or wrong.

MARIA MUST GO. CLOSE THE DOOR ON THE WAY OUT PLEASE.

Town Guard says...
10:54am Sun 7 Jun 09

What a surprise, local MPs want to shift the debate from expenses to the economy. But if they run the economy anything like they run their expenses, they are not going to be much good at it. We've haven't got to the bottom of the expenses issue yet. None of the local MPs seem to have anything worth saying on the economy either. Let's stick with expenses for a bit until we have proper answers.

Bonzo_Dog says...
7:42am Mon 8 Jun 09

It's not unusual of MP's to create an effectice smokescreen when things are getting hot. Now is not the time to consider an election or new PM no matter how bad they appear to be. We know how the media can stir up trouble where trouble doesn't exist.

Let's sort out the inhouse deceit and corruption first and get rid of those who don't deserve to be there.

When we have the correct people in power then we can expect them to do the job of running the country properly.

vernonbutcher says...
12:14pm Tue 9 Jun 09

If you cannot expect your MP's or elected officials to be straight on their expenses - how can you possibly trust them on something of major importance. They are acting like children making excuses to pardon their behaviour 'but we acted with the rules and the law'. They may have been acting within the letter but what about the spirit of the law?. Whether they like it or not they are public servants and as such SHOULD be held accountable for their actions.
The public have a right to question their behaviour when it is not what it should be. They should stop playing politics.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree