Deeside campaigners vow to continue fight to save care home

Basingstoke Gazette: Campaigners protest outside Hampshire County Council. Campaigners protest outside Hampshire County Council.

CAMPAIGNERS will look at launching a possible judicial review after Hampshire County Council decided to close a Basingstoke care home.

On Monday, members of the Cabinet at Hampshire County Council voted unanimously to close Deeside, in Alliston Way, South Ham, as well as two other care homes in Petersfield and Romsey.

Another home in Lyndhurst will remain open, but its day care facilities will close.

Deeside will close when a specialist wing is built at the Oakridge House care home, expected to be completed by next autumn. Some of Deeside’s 24 residents will then move to Oakridge.

The decision comes after months of campaigning by relatives of Deeside residents, who collected 7,301 signatures calling for Deeside to be saved.

The campaign also achieved the support of Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council, trade unions and opposition councillors at Hampshire County Council.

Les Wyatt, whose 98-year-old mother Eileen lives at Deeside, was one of six people from the campaign to speak at the cabinet meeting.

He said: “We were expecting this decision but we are all hugely disappointed that they (the Conservative-run Hampshire County Council) have not taken account of what anyone from Basingstoke has said.”

Members of the Save Deeside group were due to meet on Tuesday to discuss the possibility of a judicial review, and how to fund it.

Fellow campaigner Debbie Long, whose father is at Deeside, said: “The whole consultation process was a complete sham, and I felt they were trying to justify the decision when they were debating it.”

Hampshire County Council has said the care homes that will close are not fit-for-purpose, and it would cost £2.3million to renovate Deeside.

Councillor Roy Perry, leader of Hampshire County Council, said it had been a “very difficult” decision, adding that care staff will work with residents to provide choices about alternative accommodation.

He said: “We want to ensure their care needs are properly met now, as well as ensuring that care can be delivered in the best possible way in the future.

“This means offering quality care services and facilities that are fit for the 21st century.”

But Cllr Cathy Osselton, borough council cabinet member for partnerships, described the outcome as “unacceptable”, adding: “Current residents will be affected by the county’s longer-term plans and our council remains unconvinced that adequate alternative accommodation will be made available.”

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

12:02pm Fri 13 Dec 13

Long family says...

It is time to out conservative run Basingstoke, and bring in politicians and Councillors who actually CARE about the public needs and requirements.
It is time to out conservative run Basingstoke, and bring in politicians and Councillors who actually CARE about the public needs and requirements. Long family

7:18pm Sun 15 Dec 13

jockthekearney says...

The selling of the land Deeside is built on to buld another home which was part of the `consultation` seems to have disappeared. Then there is the Lyndhurst home where the residents are to be deprived of a home `for the 21st Century`, since it is a specialist Alzeimers unit. If Deeside is not a `specialist unit` why not?. Are such homes not needed in North Hampshire? Is pushing all the old people into one large institution really the solution for the 21st Century. In the 20th it was understood that the larger the home the less personal the care, and the smaller the home the more pesonal the care. One thing is certain, Oakridge will not be given the staff to cope with the increasing numbers..
The selling of the land Deeside is built on to buld another home which was part of the `consultation` seems to have disappeared. Then there is the Lyndhurst home where the residents are to be deprived of a home `for the 21st Century`, since it is a specialist Alzeimers unit. If Deeside is not a `specialist unit` why not?. Are such homes not needed in North Hampshire? Is pushing all the old people into one large institution really the solution for the 21st Century. In the 20th it was understood that the larger the home the less personal the care, and the smaller the home the more pesonal the care. One thing is certain, Oakridge will not be given the staff to cope with the increasing numbers.. jockthekearney

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree