LETTER

LETTER: 'We are being asked to sacrifice our countryside'

2
Skip to next photo
1/1
Show caption
1/1
This article is brought to you by our exclusive subscriber partnership with our sister title USA Today, and has been written by our American colleagues. It does not necessarily reflect the view of The Herald.
Close Icon

Find, save and share Public Notices that affect you in the area.

Search the Public Notice Portal What is the Public Notice Portal?

What is the Public Notice Portal?

The Public Notice Portal carries statutory public notices published in local newspapers and is the fastest and most effective way of finding out what is happening in YOUR neighbourhood.

Search the Public Notice Portal
Residents across Hampshire are being asked to sacrifice countryside, heritage, and productive farmland for a wave of huge solar and battery storage developments — all in the name of tackling the climate crisis. But what if I told you… we don’t even need them — not now, and not for at least another 15 years?
That’s not a personal view — it’s based on official figures from the National Energy System Operator (NESO), the new public body in charge of planning and managing the UK’s energy network.
 
According to NESO’s Clean Power 2030 targets, our region — South England — needs only:
  • 200 megawatts (MW) of new solar power
  • 100 MW of battery storage
And that’s all that’s required between now and 2035.
But here’s the problem:
Right now, this region already has:
  • 3,710 MW of solar projects in the queue — that’s 18.6 times more than needed
  • 2,960 MW of battery storage — nearly 30 times over the target
So if we’re already massively over the limit, why are developers still pushing new schemes?
Because there’s a loophole. NESO is reforming how energy projects get grid connections. Under its “Gate 2” system, projects that already have planning permission get a better chance of staying in the queue — even if they aren’t needed for years, or ever.
 
In other words, developers are chasing planning approval not because these projects are essential, but because it helps them jump the queue — and secure land, profit, and investor confidence, regardless of local impact.
It’s a speculative land grab dressed up as climate action.
 
Take the proposed solar farm near Monk Sherborne. It would cover hundreds of acres of high-quality farmland, impact wildlife and heritage sites, and lock up land that’s currently used for food production — all for a project that may never connect to the grid and definitely isn’t needed for at least 15 to 20 years.
 
We’re being asked to accept permanent damage to our rural communities for temporary commercial gain. Our countryside, our villages, and our ability to produce food are being treated as collateral damage in a system that’s already oversubscribed.
 
Make no mistake — the climate emergency is real. Renewable energy is absolutely vital. But this isn’t responsible green planning — this is opportunism. It’s development that isn’t needed now, and may never be used.
 
What we need is a smarter, fairer approach — one that protects good land, respects local communities, and only builds where there’s a clear and timely need.
 
Until then, we must stand up and say:
- No more unnecessary solar and battery farms
- Yes to energy in the right places, at the right time
 
Cllr Simon Minas-Bound
Sherborne St John and Rooksdown ward
 

Send letters by email to newsdesk@basingstokegazette.co.uk or by post to Editor, Basingstoke Gazette, Absolutely Offices, Lutyens Cl, Lychpit, Basingstoke RG24 8AG.

All letters and emails must include full names and addresses (anonymous letters will not be published), although these details may be withheld from publication, on request.

Letters of 300 words or less will be given priority, although all are subject to editing for reasons of clarity, space, or legal requirements. We reserve the right to edit letters.

Get involved
with the news

Send your news & photos