As imagined by Brian Beacom
OF COURSE, the first thing you want to know is ‘Why agree to take part in this week’s BBC documentary which covered my relationship with Gordon Brown, Tony? Couldn’t you see that it made you look so oleaginous the camera make-up almost slid down your face?’
Yes, I will accept that it seemed all about self-promotion, that I am the Irn-Bru stain on the beige carpet that is politics in that I simply refuse to go away.
But that’s not the truth of it at all. This programme simply reminded the people of Great Britain that it was I, in fact, who was the Messiah in stone-washed jeans, the Prophet Antonio who was able to lead the Labour Party out of the darkness.
Okay, some commentators have argued that I was a carpetbagger, entirely clueless about politics. And I almost confirmed this fact by admitting exactly that when I told of walking into Westminster for the first time and thinking ‘Hallelujah. This load of grey-suited old twits could use a great rock guitarist frontman in stone-washed jeans like me, who’s all show and very little substance.’
But I refute that argument completely. Any bags, even since my days at Fettes, that I’ve ever owned have been strictly Louis Vuitton.
Yet, here’s where the documentary was right on the money. Did you notice that Douglas Alexander said that Gordon and I were, literally, the Lennon and McCartney of the Labour movement? Well, if you push aside the argument that Douglas doesn’t understand what ‘literally’ means, he was dead right.
Gordy and I worked in perfect harmony. We finished each other’s songs, so to speak. He was the Lennon, the political one and I was the dreamer, the more handsome McCartney. And at the end of the day we also couldn’t bear to be in the same room as each other.
Why was this the case? You know, too much has been made of this vague idea that I’d promised to step aside after two terms and give Brown owl the chance to fly to the top. But just because you say something to someone using actual words, and with a serious expression on your face shouldn’t be taken as an actual promise.
What? You want to ask me about the news story this week, which claimed that my wife and I avoided paying £312k in stamp duty when we bought a £6.5m London property.
All I can say is that my wife and I know very little of legal matters, although I do admit that when I was told we’d saved all that money through buying the offshore firm that owned the property my first thought was, ‘Slap me on the backside with a copy of Das Kapital, Cherie baby, we’re quids in!’
Yes, it’s a week when Universal Credit has been dumped, and I see why this may create a little irritation. But isn’t socialism wonderful when the concept can be easily appropriated by a star like me?
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel