Silver Hill developer: no contribution towards affordable homes

Cllr Kim Gottlieb

Cllr Kim Gottlieb

First published in News Basingstoke Gazette: Photograph of the Author by

WINCHESTER civic chiefs are poised to allow a developer to drop any obligation to build affordable housing as part of the Silver Hill scheme.

The city council cabinet was meeting tomorrow afternoon (WED) and was being urged by their officers to allow Henderson to avoid the requirement.

Instead the contribution to social housing will be met by co-developer, the city council. The exact amount will depend of the profitability of the development.

Negotiations between the council and Hendersons has resulted in the dropping of homes for rent in the scheme, but Henderson has been expected to make a contribution for homes to be built elsewhere.

The housing issue has been a major part of the recent campaign against the revamping of the £150 million project.

Henderson also wants to drop the requirement for a bus station and offices. Instead it will see more upmarket flats and a department store.

The Cabinet is set to allow Henderson to submit a planning application for the new scheme some five years after the first scheme got planning approval.

Opponents say this is the decisive moment when the council loses its maximum negotiating strength over the nature of the development.

Cllr Kim Gottlieb, leader of the Winchester Deserves Better campaign and himself a London property developer, said: “The affordable housing proposal has been changed four times in as many months. What the Cabinet will be discussing on Wednesday is fundamentally different from what full Council and the overview and scrutiny committee thought they would be discussing, and there is no excuse for the latest proposal not to be referred back to those committees before Cabinet make a final decision.”

The council’s acting political leader, Cllr Vicki Weston, has refused a request to postpone the meeting.

Cllr Weston, in a letter to Cllr Gottlieb, said a mechanism for Henderson to contribute to such housing was “no longer acceptable because they cannot obtain funding for the development if one is included.”

“The Council can, as a developer profiting from the scheme, assign some of that profit to affordable housing. If the scheme grows in profitability then the council’s overage will increase and the amount available for affordable housing will increase,” she added.

A planning application is expected later this year.

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

7:26pm Tue 5 Aug 14

wheresthemoneygone says...

A rehash of the previous report made more comprehensible.So Hendersons aren't obliged to build affordable housing and neither are the Council.Stop the sale of Council Housing Now!
A rehash of the previous report made more comprehensible.So Hendersons aren't obliged to build affordable housing and neither are the Council.Stop the sale of Council Housing Now! wheresthemoneygone
  • Score: 5

12:06pm Wed 6 Aug 14

Shocked local resident says...

The council is giving away a golden opportunity for 100 affordable homes in the city centre to be paid for by developer ie not out of public pocket/council tax. The original planning consent was for more but the number has already been substantially reduced at developer's request. The compulsory purchase order was also made on the agreement there would be a large number of affordable homes (and bus station) on this site. Did senior council officers know this was never going to happen ie no affordable homes and no bus station. Did they deliberately mislead councillors, planning inspector and public.? Or have they been duped by developer too? Either way it stinks. This goes against the council's own planning policy that 30-40 per cent should be affordable. What will happen now at police HQ site. Winchester will become even more of an unbalanced community for the super rich. To put it in context the council is planning to build 160 council houses over next five years - and here it had a chance for 100 at no public cost.
The council is giving away a golden opportunity for 100 affordable homes in the city centre to be paid for by developer ie not out of public pocket/council tax. The original planning consent was for more but the number has already been substantially reduced at developer's request. The compulsory purchase order was also made on the agreement there would be a large number of affordable homes (and bus station) on this site. Did senior council officers know this was never going to happen ie no affordable homes and no bus station. Did they deliberately mislead councillors, planning inspector and public.? Or have they been duped by developer too? Either way it stinks. This goes against the council's own planning policy that 30-40 per cent should be affordable. What will happen now at police HQ site. Winchester will become even more of an unbalanced community for the super rich. To put it in context the council is planning to build 160 council houses over next five years - and here it had a chance for 100 at no public cost. Shocked local resident
  • Score: 7

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree