Oakley mum's toy bike safety concerns

Evie Baker, two, and her brother Jacob, five, of Pack Lane, Oakley, with the toy bike from Toys R Us, on which they both had accidents Evie Baker, two, and her brother Jacob, five, of Pack Lane, Oakley, with the toy bike from Toys R Us, on which they both had accidents

A MUM is calling on a major retailer to do more to encourage parents to take safety steps after her children were injured falling off a toy bike.

Samantha Baker bought the bike from Toys R Us two years ago for her son Jacob, who is now five.

Last year, Jacob fell off the front of the bike and split open his eyebrow.

Mrs Baker, of Pack Lane, Oakley, thought it was a simple accident and allowed her three-year-old daughter Evie to ride the bike.

But in September, Evie also fell off the bike and cut open her lip, damaging her two front teeth.

Mrs Baker has written a letter of complaint to Toys R Us to highlight her concerns about the bike.

The 37-year-old said: “The bike is very lightweight. Therefore, as soon as the bike hits a lump or bump in the ground, particularly at slow speeds, the child’s weight, along with the forward motion, means that the bike simply flips over and he or she lands face first.”

Mrs Baker has also asked Toys R Us why the bike is not sold with safety advice suggesting that protective headgear is worn, adding: “All of the product images show children riding without protective helmets.”

The exact bike Mrs Baker and her husband Aaron, 34, bought is no longer available at Toys R Us, but similar versions are still sold, including the Shark motorbike ride priced at £34.99 and the Disney Cars Moto Feber which costs £39.99.

Mrs Baker said: “Evie has been in a lot of pain and distress. It’s been a bit of a nightmare. The bike is going in the bin now.”

Mike Coogan, marketing director for Toys R Us, said: “We have written to the customer to say that this product has been on sale for two years and passes all European safety.

“We sold just over 25,000 units last year, and many thousands this year, and have never experienced this type of issue in the past. Whilst we are sympathetic towards the customer, it’s a very rare occurrence.”

Comments(11)

Trueblue46 says...
7:00pm Mon 15 Oct 12

I find it quite unbelievable that the second child is allowed to ride a bike the parents consider unsafe but then she blames the store from which it was bought. Parents should make a decision as to whether their child wears a helmet, irrelevant of advertising. If the bike was too light for the son surely that fact remained the same for the daughter!

I hate this blame everyone else society.

Folkestone Saint says...
11:14pm Mon 15 Oct 12

So for a whole year the bike has been safe, then over the next year only two accidents, I would call that a safe bike in that case, as for helmets, do you need instructions on every decision you make or is it "compensation time". P.S. I hope the bin it is being thrown into is the recycling bin.

Best_Name_Ever says...
7:52am Tue 16 Oct 12

I agree Folkstone Saint - it must be 'compensation time'. It looks like a cheap, lightweight bike for your kids to use in the garden. As for no safety advice, you would have thought logic kicked in.

Buster Preciation says...
8:26am Tue 16 Oct 12

Sometimes I think the Gazette publishes these stories just to start a debate. I don't think it will work this time as I don't think many contributors will side with Mrs Baker.

W Wallace says...
10:53am Tue 16 Oct 12

Why do they still have the bike in this photo when there are no signs of either injury? It would lead me to believe the bike isn't yet in the bin after Septembers accident and someone is pushing for some sort of compensation from toys'r'us or the manufacturer.

Sam_Walker123456 says...
12:56pm Tue 16 Oct 12

Buster Preciation wrote:
Sometimes I think the Gazette publishes these stories just to start a debate. I don't think it will work this time as I don't think many contributors will side with Mrs Baker.
Sometimes I think Buster writes his comments just to start me off.
The Gazette has one main aim - to make money for its owners. How does it do this? By informing, entertaining, provoking, stimulating its readers and selling advertising space (incidentally, somethimes I think that companies only advertise to get me to buy their products and services).
Talk about stating the obvious Buster! Of course The Gazette wants to provoke debate. But I don't think it cares if the debate is one sided, as in this case, or not.
As for Mrs Baker, it is not her fault. She is 37 and has been brought up in a society which has not allowed her generation to think for itself or take risks. Of course she expects Toys R Us to do all the risk assessment in the same way as some people expect MacDonalds to sell coffee which is not too hot to drink!

Marina Morris says...
1:26pm Tue 16 Oct 12

Oakley children in falling over whilst growing up shock! Heaven forbid they should ever play football ! I guess they'll never be allowed a proper bike?

Buster Preciation says...
2:10pm Wed 17 Oct 12

jonone wrote:
Mr & Mrs Baker - too stupid to breed, but sadly have done.
That's a bit harsh on Mr Baker (if there is one). He's keeping a low profile in the matter and I don't blame him.

robertspet8 says...
2:39pm Wed 17 Oct 12

Buster Preciation wrote:
jonone wrote: Mr & Mrs Baker - too stupid to breed, but sadly have done.
That's a bit harsh on Mr Baker (if there is one). He's keeping a low profile in the matter and I don't blame him.
Mrs Baker bought the bike with her husband Aaron, 34. How could I possibly know this?

Sam_Walker123456 says...
3:29pm Wed 17 Oct 12

'Mrs Baker bought the bike with her husband Aaron, 34.'
Since when could you trade in secondhand husbands for new toy bikes, robert? I need a new bike myself, do you think Halfords will take my brother as payment?

Folkestone Saint says...
3:34pm Wed 17 Oct 12

Sam_Walker123456 wrote:
'Mrs Baker bought the bike with her husband Aaron, 34.'
Since when could you trade in secondhand husbands for new toy bikes, robert? I need a new bike myself, do you think Halfords will take my brother as payment?
They might if his name is Sterling or if it's a cheap bike Bob

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree