Merton Rise scheme resurrected

A LARGE housing development, shelved because of the recession, is set to be resurrected by a partnership between a housing developer and a Basingstoke-based housing association.

Persimmon Homes and Sentinel Housing Association are finalising plans for 784 new homes at Merton Rise, next to Everest Community Academy, in Popley.

Planners hope to submit a detailed planning application by the end of the year, and a spokesman for Sentinel said it hopes to start building the first of three phases by early 2013.

Persimmon and Sentinel together bought the land from Hampshire County Council for an undisclosed amount earlier this month.

Sentinel chief executive Martin Nurse said he hoped the plans will help young people get on to the housing ladder.

He added: “We are very pleased to be in partnership with Persimmon Homes in getting Merton Rise moving forward.

“Sentinel has been working hard in bringing forward new housing development, partly to support the local economy emerging from the recession and to provide much-needed affordable homes for local people.

“We hope this gives a boost to people seeking housing, particularly for young people looking for their first home, as we are addressing the shortage of good homes they can afford in Basingstoke.”

The proposed development won outline planning permission – borough council approval of the scheme in principle – in December 2010.

But development was stalled by an earlier decision by the county council landowners who opted to stop promoting the land until the housing market picked up. Overall, Persimmon will provide 471 homes and, alongside Sentinel, will spend £35million building 313 affordable homes, which will be made up of 196 socially rented homes, and 117 shared ownership properties.

Persimmon will develop their part of the project with their sister company Charles Church. Welcoming the new deal, Persimmon managing director Danny O’Connor

said: “We are delighted to have secured this important site and to be working in partnership with Sentinel on bringing forward the delivery of much-needed new homes at Merton Rise.

“The scheme will be a major contributor to stimulating the local economy and creating long-term jobs for local people.”

The development will also feature a new community centre, 10 hectares of open space, and allotments.

Comments(9)

shame says...
8:12am Sun 14 Oct 12

old news.......... suppose if the reporters are all in southampton it takes a while to filter down

ResidentPerson says...
10:27am Sun 14 Oct 12

That explains all the surveying that has been going on over the last week. Good to see something will finally happen.

nothingchanges says...
8:48am Mon 15 Oct 12

What on earth does "socially rented" mean? Ridiculous name for government subsidised rent. Why do they insist on giving things these "unoffensive" names when it might actually drive people to strive to improve their situation if they were called exactly what they are? Socially rented = state supported housing and Benefits = state aid. Who's going to go round feeling smug because they're on state aid?! Benefits = positive sound, state aid/support = negative thus pushing to improve!

popleyrebel2 says...
10:36am Tue 16 Oct 12

Most people in Popley would welcome the completion of the Merton Rise development because the developers/Council left in their wake a blot on the landscape (rubbish-tip) unprotected from travellers who had a return ticket whenever they chose to return.
That said, most are against any further development in Popley, myself included.

popleyrebel2 says...
11:56am Tue 16 Oct 12

I welcome Sentinel Housing Association building 196 rented properties, too much pressure has been forced on people to have one foot on the ladder, a ladder they can’t afford and therefore, more rented accommodation should be built by Housing Associations, furthermore, I have a major issue with those who have stigmatised Housing Association tenants as benefit cheats.
In all walks of life you have cheats and it’s true to say Housing Associations have their share, however, the majority are not benefit cheats/ scroungers.
People in private rent are receiving benefits, and whatever reason they need help, however, there is no stigma attached to them (rightly so)
All those who constantly condemn Housing Associations tenants should just take a step back.
“Tomorrow it could be you”

Sam_Walker123456 says...
1:39pm Tue 16 Oct 12

shame wrote:
old news.......... suppose if the reporters are all in southampton it takes a while to filter down
The reporters are based in Pelton Road, Basingstoke.

jonone says...
12:11pm Wed 17 Oct 12

popleyrebel2, those of us who do have an "opinion" of housing association tenants are probably just wondering why we bothered trying to make something of our lives if people who don't are put up in great comfort for far less than we pay. Families in the social housing next to me all have Sky TV (multi-room in one case!), nice big wall mounted flat screen tellies, all have more children than I can afford (ranging between 3 and 8 per house - all of whom appear to have their own bikes and are generally dressed in brand name clothing etc. Only the odd one left in school uniform at weekends), numerous pets (up to 3 dogs next door for example), regularly smoking (at £8+ for 20), drinking cans of Stella - frequently on doorsteps and the street rather than indoors. Nice cars are a frequent thing too! My opinion as a result is only based the evidence presented to me via my own eyes and I hope that I have just presented facts above. I have no problem whatsoever with welfare support, but if people have, for example, Sky TV, then support needs to be cut by the monthly value. Sky is a luxury, not a right, and I should not be subsiding luxuries, when I am counting the pennies at the end of the month.

popleyrebel2 says...
12:48pm Wed 17 Oct 12

Quote from popleyrebel2
“In all walks of life you have cheats and it’s true to say Housing Associations have their share, however, the majority are not benefit cheats/ scroungers” un-quote.
Jonone,
I agree with you, however, all Housing Associations tenants shouldn’t be tarred with same brush, furthermore, not all Housing Associations tenants are not on benefit.

LesFrèresCrucy says...
12:58am Thu 18 Oct 12

Jon - you won't win an argument on social housing when the goody goodies are protesting rights for other people. All the cliches come out against it and personal experience is trivialised. Guilt-ridden universal rights-based immunity supported by politically correct popular opinion trumps all. Anything else is offensive and that is illegal on this forum. Those who do not condemn are terrorists.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree