Borough cabinet chief rejects congested parking cash call

THE BOROUGH council’s Cabinet chief in charge of residential parking has admitted that congested streets are a problem – but she has dismissed Labour calls for a cash injection of up to £1million to tackle the problem.

Councillor Cathy Osselton, Conservative member for partnerships on the borough’s decision-making Cabinet, said that enough council cash is already being put towards the issue.

She added that Basingstoke and Deane is “unique” because it actually had a scheme aimed at improving problem streets.

She said: “Many residential areas, especially those built in the 1960s and 1970s, suffer from issues with parking availability, and I know that this must cause frustration for residents.

“We are one of only a few councils that has invested in a programme to gradually improve parking provision, and we have earmarked funds for it over the next few years, despite funding pressures in other areas that residents have told us are a higher priority for them.”

She rejected Labour’s idea of releasing up to £1m from the council’s £3.5m 2011-12 surplus to tackle the worst-affected areas.

Cllr Ossleton said: “The reserves to fund the capital programme are maintained to ensure that the council’s four-year capital programme and future programmes can be afforded.

“Part of the reserves fund is invested to provide income to service the cost of projects and to help the council to provide residents with the lowest rate of council tax in Hamp-shire.

“If all of the council’s reserves were to be spent at once, then there would be no capital to fund future projects. Resources are limited and the council needs to prioritise the projects that will be undertaken.”

Comments(3)

Jo Walke says...
10:01pm Mon 8 Oct 12

It's not just those estates built 40-50 years go that suffer with such parking problems!
Basingstoke needs to urgently make further provision within it's older estates!!

It also needs to ensure it learns from the past/increase in vehicular ownership & review parking provision further within it's planning guidelines for future developments.
(development further from the town, failing bus connections & the increase in expectation of existing services to provide for such developments mean a reduction in car use is a long way off! despite, no doubt costly, new paths/cycle ways !!)

Cynical Reader says...
11:18am Tue 9 Oct 12

Far too many garages are being used for storage or workshops instead of cars. This is encouraged by the housing associations.
If you have a garage, put your car in it.

jonone says...
12:58pm Tue 9 Oct 12

Labour really are such idiots. One place where parking problems can be discovered in spades is any new development, e.g Marnel Park/Everest Park etc. These are all built to current building regulations set by, er, the last Labour government! On Everest Park, the number of spaces allocated per house is (inexplicably) 1.6, so the majority of 3 bed and even 4 bed family homes have one parking space - the only difference it seems being the affordable houses, where all houses appear to have 2 spaces. Doesn't take a genius to work out the problem that present! Everest Park has 274 plots, the regs provide around 440 spaces (give or take), plus a handful of unallocated spaces, the actual demand is realistically 548, an average of 2 cars per household. Add to that the fact that spaces are situated away from properties, results in lazier people parking on the road in the front of their own houses. As for the use of garages as storage, well that is down to bad house design. My new house doesn't have a garage, but the storage it comes with as standard comprises of the kitchen cuboards! No understairs store (toilet instead - but used as a store!), no store cupboards on upper floors, no loft to speak of. If I did have a garage, it would be a store too! But, seriously, new developments should allow for 2 cars per house minimum, or bring back layouts that allow for driveways. You cannot force cars off the road by not providing parking for them, you just create a problem.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree