Local RSS Feed


Village hall goes for green power

Village hall goes for green power Village hall goes for green power

SOLAR panels could be installed on the roof of a village hall in a Basingstoke suburb.

Brookvale Community Association has submitted an application to the borough council, asking for permission to install 40 panels on Brookvale Village Hall, in Lower Brook Street.

The application says the panels, which would cover 65 square metres, would secure “future revenues, to reduce the running costs of the hall and to demonstrate the value of renewable energy.”

The hall was built in 1983 and was extended in 1987 before being renovated in 1999.

It is leased from Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council and is managed by Brookvale Community Association (BCA), which is a registered charity.

The application says the hall has a south-facing roof, which is ideal for solar panels. It adds that the solar panels are estimated to generate 9,400kwh of electricity per year and reduce carbon emissions by five tons annually, helping the association to reach its target of making the hall carbon neutral.

However, the community association could be affected by the Government proposals to reduce Feed-in-Tariffs (FITs) for new solar photovoltaic (PV) installations, which is currently under consultation. Anyone installing panels after December 12, 2011, could be affected.

FITs is the money paid for the electricity generated through the solar panels. The Government previously said that the FITs will remain unchanged until April 2012, with a rate of 43.3p/kwh.

But because of a rapid rise in solar PV installations, a rapid decrease in solar PV costs and the need to provide value for money, the Government decided to hold a fast track review on the matter and said a reduced rate of 21p/kwh would be offered instead from April 1, 2012, which would affect installations with an eligibility date on or after December 12, 2011.

The Government’s position has been challenged by solar power firms, which argue that this was unfair because the decision came two weeks before the end of an official consultation.

The High Court agreed but the Government is now challenging this, the result of which will be revealed in a few weeks. If the Government wins, then the December 12, 2011, cut-off date will be reinstated. But if it loses, then a new date of March 3 will be put in place.

Martin Heath, who submitted the planning application on behalf of BCA, said: “At worst, the FIT rate will fall to 21p for small systems. BCA calculate that even with this lower rate, we will still generate a tax-free interest rate of about 10 per cent and will generate significant income for the association for the next 25 years.”

Mr Heath, who is part of Basingstoke Transition Town, a local charity aimed at making Basingstoke less reliant on fossil fuels and reducing the area’s impact on the environment, has presented the results of a study on solar PV panels to the borough council.

He said: “This shows that solar PV still represents an excellent investment opportunity for us all, even with the lower rates.”

Comments(6)

robertspet8 says...
1:21pm Fri 27 Jan 12

It is disgraceful the way the Government has changed the FIT arrangements.
The solar panel industry has made big investments based on government declared committments to this form of green energy. The industry knew changes to the FIT would be made by April this year and were already in consultation with the government and planning for these changes.
For the government to announce, out of the blue, that they were pulling forward the change date by several months was appalling. It created a short term high demand with customers, suppliers and installers trying to beat the new deadline, followed by orders falling to all-time-lows and putting several thousand industry jobs under risk of redundancy. In other words boom followed by bust (where have we heard that before?).
For the green industry to make effective long term plans they need long term committment from the government not short term cost measures which, although dressed up as cost savings, will probaby cost the country more in lost jobs than it saves in reduced FIT payments over the long term.
I hope justice is served and the government lose their appeal.
This goverment is gaining a reputation for moving the goalposts before the game is finished.

SunSmart Energy says...
5:05pm Sun 29 Jan 12

Very true. We are a local solar energy firm based near Winchester and sales have dropped by 90% since the Govt's announcement. The crazy thing is that it's actually about the same return on investment (10%) as this time last year because although the tariff has been reduced it's also true that system prices have come down by about 50% from last year.

GC31 says...
8:45pm Sun 29 Jan 12

I'm not saying this hasn't been poorly handled by the government, but the reasons for cutting the tariff seem sound. I read that if current take up rates had continued it was projected that the subsidy would add £36 to the bill of every household in the UK. Doesn't seem right to me that poorer households should subsidise people who can afford the outlay and own a house suitable for panels in the first place. Also, the subsidy wasn't intended to make people a huge return on investment and given the reduced installation cost that is what was starting to happen.

I hope SunSmart and others ride this out and demand picks up as soon as the mess is sorted. I would still invest in solar panels, although not until there is some certainty about the tariff.

principal_skinner says...
6:32pm Mon 30 Jan 12

I'm was once told that it was illegal to generate your own electricity for domestic use? Surely that can't be true?

Sod solar, I'm considering a oil fired generator that runs on chip fat a human waste.

robertspet8 says...
5:06pm Tue 31 Jan 12

....and I am going to use all the hot air generated by us all in these comment pages :-)

principal_skinner says...
12:23pm Wed 1 Feb 12

In which case Robert, your generator trumps mine. I was just going to use all the c**p I spout, but the combined hot air does indeed exceed that.

Local Businesses

Most popular