Local RSS Feed


Build plan "is dead"


THE requirement for 945 homes to be built every year in Basingstoke and Deane is “as good as dead”, a borough planning chief has claimed.

The borough council’s Cabinet member for planning, Councillor Rob Golding said the election of the new Government had killed off the ruling that the borough had to build at least 18,900 homes between 2006 and 2026.

Cllr Golding, a Conservative, said: “I don’t see any possibility of us having to build 945.”

Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council has produced a new version of the Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA), a controversial document which has previously provoked uproar in places such as Old Basing and Overton because of the sites it suggests could take hundreds of new homes.

The latest version of the SHLAA was produced largely using the assumption that 945 new homes have to be built annually over the 20-year period.

Although he admitted the 945 figure was “as good as dead”, Cllr Golding said the SHLAA was still necessary because the borough would have to build new homes.

“It’s long been this council’s policy to build the homes we need for the local population,” he said.

Now that Conservatives are in coalition with the Liberal Democrats at Westminster, they are able to put into practice their opposition to the previous Labour Government’s South East Plan, which imposed the house-building target on the borough.

Basingstoke’s Conservative MP Maria Miller said that before the election Caroline Spelman, then Shadow Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, told councils a Conservative government would revoke Labour’s housing targets.

Mrs Miller said: “It is absolutely our intention to be able to let local authorities to take back control of their planning process.

“I think the SHLAA process is completely discredited and it just exposed how out of touch the planning process has become under 13 years of Labour government.

“I don’t want residents to be scared about the future. They need to be able to determine the future of the community.”

Comments(3)

stevemac1970 says...
2:22pm Sun 6 Jun 10

Here we have the good and bad in one for the dropping of such plans. As things stand, the town and surrounding areas can't cope with these ambitious numbers, but what happens with the house prices when there is even less property available to those that need it. Young families can't get on the housing ladder, and the local social housing providers don't have the stock, where do the children of the town get housed when they want to start a family of their own? Looks like we could be on the slippery slope all the way back to square one. The town may not want the houses, but the children of the town will probably need them. All of us with children in the town will watch this with interest and ask the question, what's in it for them?

mhtcpk says...
8:31am Mon 7 Jun 10

Basingstoke has many empty office blocks as technology allows us to work from home, and if beaurocracy is reduced we will not need any offices. It would be cheaper to convert these office blocks into accomodation than to build new houses. Also, if people were were willing to let others have their spare rooms and schedule everything so that equipment can be shared between families, there would be sufficient housing to ensure that no person who wants a house ends up homeless without having to destroy more countryside. Instead of selling houses so that wealthy people have second homes while others have none, we should give them away to the people who need them most. If society were to do away with money altogether and just give things away instead, there would no longer be poverty, pestering adverts for useless products and fashion items or such an extent of environmental destruction.

stevemac1970 says...
2:21pm Tue 8 Jun 10

And if there were no money, and we all gave things away, who would give to the poor safe in the knowledge they won't give back, who would repair, safe in the knowledge they would get nothing for their efforts, who would even bother to learn or teach if they got nothing for it? Then we need to import things and pay for that, how do we get paid for exports... Having said that, the borough likes the office block idea, you only need look at what was IBM to know that, a trendy local block of flats that none of the locals can afford. We need to reduce the cost of housing or we're stuck with the rich own and the poor rent to make more money for the rich.


Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses