News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Fears over water targets


SEVERE water rationing targets could lead to people in north Hampshire using less water than people in India, a public inquiry heard.

Basingstoke and Deane Borough councillor Onnalee Cubitt, who represents Basing ward, said the Government wanted water consumption slashed to levels seen in developing countries with hot climates.

The councillor was joining campaigning groups giving evidence at a public inquiry into the South East Water’s Water Resources Management plan.

The review was called last year by the then Environment Secretary Hilary Benn amid concerns over water shortages in the next 25 years.

The month long review has been taking place in Gatwick – but one session was held at Mapledurwell and Up Nately Village Hall last week at the request of Cllr Cubitt.

Giving evidence, Cllr Cubitt said: “The South East of England has already been deemed an area of severe water stress.

“We currently have less water available per head than many sub-Saharan countries in Africa.”

The councillor said this was significant because the borough had been earmarked to take at least 945 homes each year up to 2026.

Cllr Cubitt’s said her other chief concern was surging water usage reducing the flow and water quality of the River Loddon.

Borough councillor Stephen Reid and Odiham parish councillor Mark Faulkner, plus representatives from the Whitewater Valley Preservation Society, Save Our Loddon Valley and Environ-ment (SOLVE) and the Surrey and Hants Canal Society Authority also gave evidence.

Cllr Reid, chairman of the borough council’s planning and infrastructure committee, said: “My belief is that the water company should not be forced to plan for savings that are aspirational but instead be allowed to predict what is sensibly achievable.”

He argued tight water rationing would fail because the number of single-person households, which consume more per head than families, was growing.

And water metering was not a solution because it would disproportionately hit families, he added.

Nigel Bell, of the Whitewater Valley Preservation Society, said sustained abstraction from chalk in West Ham and Cliddesden was reducing the River Loddon’s flow and increases in treated effluent levels in the Loddon – already six times higher than an average chalk river – threatened its delicate ecology.

He said: “It is clear to us that that South East Water has ridden roughshod over environmental issues and taken no notice of representation made by us during the public consultation [for the Water Resources Management plan].”

SOLVE chairman Kate Tuck echoed his concerns, telling the inquiry that studies showed even marginal population changes in the area risked damaging the river’s rich ecology.

Comments(3)

shame says...
2:24pm Thu 3 Jun 10

hmm lovely sentiment if is was for the good of the planet but sound's more like our old friend covert nimbyism ! I take that the two pictured have large river side houses as do the vast majority of the two groups ?????????but wait i have a new and more honest group to start up it is called (SOLVE) Save Our Lovely Expensive Equity people wish to protect their country riverside idiom from the general public at large that's fine and to be applauded why should anyone not be able to protect something they have worked hard for ................. but do it up front

and yes i live in a village with a major Hampshire river running through it

stephen reid says...
3:48pm Thu 3 Jun 10

No, Shame, I disagree with your charge of covert Nimbyism. The problem of Basingstoke's fresh water supply is a whole-of-Borough issue as is the problem of waste water treatment.

To explain: in the terms of water supply, it makes little difference whether homes are built North South East or West because the fresh water for them will come from bore holes in the aquifers, distributed through pipes. If there isn't enough fresh water, we face the prospect of rationing by price, which I do not want to see.

Similarly, it doesn't matter whether a toilet is flushed North South East or West either: the outfall goes to the sewage works at Chineham. Those works are already over-polluting the River Loddon with phosphates.

If the water tables fall because of over-extraction, thereby reducing fresh water flows into the Loddon, and the sewage volumes rise, thereby increasing the treated outflows into the River Loddon, the pollution problem in our river could be made significantly worse.

The charge of Nimby-ism therefore falls. This is about whole-Borough planning.

What we are trying to do is identify whether infrastructure is a constraint on the growth of Basingstoke and, if it is, to what extent. There is significant evidence to suggest that there are infrastructure constraints and that fresh water supply may be one of them.

At the public inquiry, I therefore urged the inspector to allow the Water Company to make accurate predictions of water usage so that the Council can have a realistic picture of the constraints that might exist. That way we will have the best evidence available to inform our planning decisions.

bellou says...
6:01pm Thu 3 Jun 10

Of course it's covert NIMBYISM. Just because there is a coalition government is no excuse to nick each other's clothing! The Liberal Democrats are the environmentalists and that's all there is to it.


Fears over water targets Fears over water targets

Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses