Problem pavilions in Rooksdown could be knocked down

One of the pavilions in Rooksdown

One of the pavilions in Rooksdown

First published in News by , Chief Reporter

PAVILIONS which have become a hot-spot for anti-social behaviour in a Basingstoke suburb could soon be removed.

Following years of complaints from residents in Rooksdown, developer Taylor Wimpey has finally submitted a planning application to Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council requesting permission to knock down the structures.

When the application was discussed by members of Rooksdown Parish Council, some councillors were reluctant to support the plans because of the history of the wooden shelters – but residents’ wishes to have them removed proved to be a key factor.

Council chairman Cllr Colin Statham explained the history behind the pavilions, which were original features of the former hospital, used by patients to sit outside.

Their upkeep was meant to be paid for through a community development trust, paid into by residents.

But Cllr Statham said the trust had never been activated.

A consultation was held with residents asking what should be done with the pavilions, and the overwhelming response was that they should be pulled down.

Cllr Statham said: “Vandalism has continued. There have been issues with drugs and there have been complaints from various householders.”

Rooksdown Parish Council initially supported the proposals, but members were asked for their opinions again in light of the application being submitted.

Cllr Statham said: “My personal view on this matter is that as the chair of the parish council, it’s my public duty to respect the wishes of the residents who took the time and trouble to comment on the proposal to remove the pavilions.

“However, I do believe it’s a crying shame. I personally would like to see some sort of restoration of these somewhere where they won’t be vandalised and looked after properly and remain part of Basingstoke’s recent history.”

Several councillors said they felt the pavilions should remain where they are.

Cllr Nazim Khan said: “The pavilions were put into the community and it’s the community’s responsibility to have them there. My view is they should remain in place.”

Cllr Ailsa Cordner added: “I would like to see them stay but I have to respect the view of the public.”

A vote by councillors showed four in favour of the plans and four against. As chairman, Cllr Statham had the casting vote and chose to support the application to remove the pavilions.

A final decision will be made by the borough council’s development control committee.

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

1:48pm Wed 18 Jun 14

Buster Preciation says...

Demolition is not really solving the problem is it? It's just moving it to another part of the estate where different residents will start to complain. And it's the younger generation of the very same residents that are the cause of the problem. How about the residents take some responsibility for their offspring?
Failing that how about the police actually taking action against criminal behaviour rather than just asking someone else to knock a shed down?
Demolition is not really solving the problem is it? It's just moving it to another part of the estate where different residents will start to complain. And it's the younger generation of the very same residents that are the cause of the problem. How about the residents take some responsibility for their offspring? Failing that how about the police actually taking action against criminal behaviour rather than just asking someone else to knock a shed down? Buster Preciation
  • Score: 16

4:21pm Thu 19 Jun 14

JC76 says...

Why not install CCTV in the immediate area and lighting? You'd soon stop this type of anti-social behaviour by immature social outcasts.
Why not install CCTV in the immediate area and lighting? You'd soon stop this type of anti-social behaviour by immature social outcasts. JC76
  • Score: 5

9:06am Tue 24 Jun 14

jonone says...

Buster Preciation wrote:
Demolition is not really solving the problem is it? It's just moving it to another part of the estate where different residents will start to complain. And it's the younger generation of the very same residents that are the cause of the problem. How about the residents take some responsibility for their offspring? Failing that how about the police actually taking action against criminal behaviour rather than just asking someone else to knock a shed down?
Taking responsibility for your kids? What a suggestion!!!

(Absolutely right of course)
[quote][p][bold]Buster Preciation[/bold] wrote: Demolition is not really solving the problem is it? It's just moving it to another part of the estate where different residents will start to complain. And it's the younger generation of the very same residents that are the cause of the problem. How about the residents take some responsibility for their offspring? Failing that how about the police actually taking action against criminal behaviour rather than just asking someone else to knock a shed down?[/p][/quote]Taking responsibility for your kids? What a suggestion!!! (Absolutely right of course) jonone
  • Score: 3

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree