Help for families which cost the taxpayer tens of thousands of pounds

FAMILIES that cost the taxpayer tens of thousands of pounds will be given extra help in a bid to help them and also reduce the cost to the public purse.

Work has started in Basingstoke to give additional support to families who have a history of anti-social or criminal behaviour, have children who regularly skip school, or have an adult on out-of-work benefits.

According to a presentation to councillors on Basingstoke and Deane’s community wellbeing committee, families that fit the criteria can cost the taxpayer up to £75,000 a year.

The new scheme – called the Supporting Troubled Families Programme – is being bankrolled by central Government, and administered by Hampshire County Council.

Gary Westbrook, the strategic lead for the programme in Hampshire, said the Government initiative provides a “unique opportunity to improve the lives of troubled families and communities”.

In Basingstoke and Deane, up to 250 families will be helped over the programme’s three-year plan, with 85 families getting assistance in 2013.

The programme aims to help families by co-ordinating social services support. In Basingstoke, a ‘local co-ordination group’ will ensure different services and charities are working together and this should bring down the costs.

“We are all trying to do more with less,” said Mr Westbrook. “Troubled families cost us a lot of money. Some of these families are highly complex.”

Local councillors have welcomed the plans. Liberal Democrat borough councillor Gavin James, right, said: “I think working closer together will be great – there are families out there with massive and significant problems.”

Earlier this year, Hampshire County Coun-cil agreed to add £900,000 to the programme on top of the Government’s £5.3m.

Cllr Ken Thornber, chairman of the Hampshire Senate, which is a partnership of the county council, local district and borough councils, and key county agencies, also welcomed the initiative.

He said: “By engaging families who need early help to avoid escalating problems, this will help to reduce the need for other agencies to assist at a later date to address more serious problems. This will also mean that we can help avoid significant costs to public funds in the longer term.”

Comments(4)

JJ38JJ says...
11:32am Fri 15 Mar 13

Call me old fashioned but I was always told that breaking the law could result in punishment, not reward.
If these families continue to commit crimes when they get more than their fair share of public money by what logic will they stop if we spend even more? What's the phrase? Throwing good money anfter bad?

lovemychildren says...
11:57am Fri 15 Mar 13

However it's not about just giving them money is it?
It's about spending money on helping and supporting them?

robertspet8 says...
11:58am Fri 15 Mar 13

Close JJ38JJ but 'after' would be a better word to use in that phrase.
I my gut reaction is to agree with your sentiments - we are clearly being soft otherwise why would we be spending up to £75,000 pa on some of these families when the average wage is c£26,000? But then I think if the carrots aren't working will the stick be any better? The stick will probably not work and will almost certainly cost us more if prison is involved (it costs close to £50,000 pa to keep someone in prison and we are looking at here at famalies with possibly several criminal members).
I don't know the answer but we owe it to ourselves to at least spend some money to try and solve the problem. If we don't then it will only get worse and £75,000 will become £100,000 very soon.

Ding says...
11:57am Mon 18 Mar 13

Wrap them up in cotton wool and throw money at them ... it makes you wonder why we go out to work everyday.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree