Home page
Site Map
Search Advanced Search
Today's most viewed
Developer 'ignores' council chief’s advice

THE developer bringing forward a landmark development for a new gateway quarter for Basingstoke has not followed the borough council's advice on consultation.

That's the view of Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council chief executive Tony Curtis on the approach taken by Lemon Land, which has unveiled radical plans for the former Eli Lilly site.

The developer launched a consultation with residents, councillors and other interested parties. The first public meeting, on June 18, was chaotic as the plans provoked a hostile reaction from many residents.

Mr Curtis told The Gazette: "In recent months, my discussions with Lemon Land have focused on the principles of development, the council's ambitions to achieve a learning campus and how best to engage the local community.

"The discussions have not been about the details of any future planning application.

"My advice has been that there should be a comprehensive programme of community engagement, taking a neighbourhood planning approach.

"Lemon Land chose not to follow that advice and instead to undertake the current consultation. This site-specific exercise has not been endorsed by the council."

Mr Curtis explained that a neighbourhood planning approach would place the development in a ward context, taking account of other planned developments, such as the council's ideas for housing on the former South View allotments and adjoining plots of land, so residents could offer their input on more than one site.

He added: "The council has not participated in the current consultation and it is not for me to comment on how it has been handled by the developer."

Mathew Mainwaring, a director at Lemon Land's planning consultants Indigo Planning, disagreed with Mr Curtis' view.

He said: "As part of the overall application, and as made clear at the exhibition and consultation evening on June 18, the planning application will take into account committed developments in the area already identified in the Basingstoke Local Plan."

9:06am Thursday 3rd July 2008

Related Links
Proposals given warm welcome
Print   Email this   Comment
Posted by: Picket Dewfury, Basingstoke on 10:06am Thu 3 Jul 08
AFAIR, it was quite legal and proper to ignore 'advice' the last time I checked.
Posted by: Jo Walke on 12:03am Sat 5 Jul 08
so they've 'taken into account' committed developments but not the council's ideas for any future development - seems a bit rum really as their large scale development will have an impact on those ideas for that area.......and perhaps Worting Road.
Posted by: Alan, South Ham on 10:03am Tue 8 Jul 08
This is a bit of a turn up for the book, the council complaining of a developer not having fair and proper consultation!

Have we already forgotten the farce behind the Gresley Road triangle development when 'our' council's consultation took place behind closed doors?
Posted by: Hats Zeitgeist, Hatch Warren on 3:26pm Tue 8 Jul 08
Mind you - if Cllr Harvey had not rubber stamped agressive building targets in the first place . . .
Add your comment
Please note: to publish your comment you must be registered on this site. If you are already registered, please enter your details below.
Email:
Password:
Archive
The Basingstoke Gazette brings you 1000s of jobs, homes and cars every day
Powered by Powered by Fish4
Recruitment Central

Editorial advertising features

Click2Find

Photos and videos
You can now send in your photos and videos taken on your mobile phone to The Gazette's news room. Click here to find out how
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy © Copyright 2001-2008
Newsquest Media Group
A Gannett Company
This site is part of Newsquest's audited local newspaper network